Moscow Center for Prison ReformSearchWrite UsIndexScheme Home Page
Banner MCPR

Norms relating to prisoner's maintenance


The constitutional right to protection of health and medical service is grossly abused everywhere; standards of nutrition, clothing and bedding established by the Russian government in 1992 are not observed. Hunger and contagious diseases are common in many penitentiary institutions. Sanitary and hygienic need are greatly underserved in ITUs (for more details refer to the documents of section 2). The situation with providing prisoners with the minimum necessary to survive (let alone observing standards stipulated by law) is catastrophic. It is not surprising:

in 1995 the daily cost of feeding one prisoner was only 4,555 rubles (a little more than $1). In 1994 the majority of prisoners would have died but for the help of relatives, friends, charity organizations and local authorities.

It should be noted that the Law of June 12 provided a legal remedy for this situation. The number of parcels and amount of money inmates can spend on food and items of basic necessity was increased for all groups of prisoners. But less than a half of prisoners (49%) received the maximum number of parcels and 11.6% do not receive parcels at all.

In 1994, only 46% could exercise their right to buy food and items of basic necessity, 34.2% could buy nothing because they had no money.

We are not surprised. The census of prisoners showed that 52.3% of prisoners did not receive their salaries on their accounts; 21% had less than 10,000 rubles (about $4); 8.4% from 10,000 to 20,000 rubles; 8% from 20,000 to 40,000; 4.6% from 40,000 to 60,000; 2.4% from 60,000 to 80,000; 1.3% from 80,000 to 100,000; and 2% over 100,000.

Thus, prisoners' economic demands that were generally satisfied in 1991 and 1992, were rarely met in 1993—95 due to ITUs' inability to provide prisoners with normal paying jobs and poor financing from the federal budget.

Two more standards which are essential in the present social and economic situation:

A 10-day term from when sentence comes in force for transporting a prisoner from a SIZO to an ITU (art. 14 of the Correctional Labor Code).

In 1994 and 1995, the term stipulated in this article was almost never observed because the Internal Ministry cannot cover its expenses on transporting prisoners. Some cases are recorded when prisoners waited one or two months.

 

 


| About Center | Search | Write Us | Index | Scheme | Home Page |

Copyright © 1998 Moscow Center for Prison Reform. All rights reserved.
Design and support © 1998 Moscow Center for Prison Reform. All rights reserved.